//--> We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the . A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. 172.104.52.81 Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. Sometimes they are more busy. The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. The reviewers only make recommendations. Table 11 sketches the different situations the editor may encounter and the decision s/he usually makes in each of these situations. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below.